Archive for the ‘social change’ Tag
Filed under: climate change, economy, energy | Tags: energy economy, green energy, policy, politics, self-improvement, social change, social justice
Matt Kelley has an interesting and thought provoking post at Change.org on training prisoners in green jobs to help them re-enter society.
Corrections departments and facilities around the world offer many kinds of training for prisoners, including GEDs and college degrees, vocations like carpentry and plumbing and artistic talents like painting and video production. But prisons are too far behind the curve. Green jobs — including earth-friendly construction and solar panel manufacturing and installation among many, many other specialties — are certain to be booming in the years ahead, and prisons are a perfect place to teach these trades.
The comments are worth reading as well.
I wonder: how receptive is our society to training prisoners to take some of the best-paying jobs, especially given the current state of the economy? Ex-convicts should become productive members of society, but should that come at the expense displaced workers who haven’t committed a crime, or had to pay for their own training?
Filed under: energy, financing | Tags: energy economy, energy independence, energy policy, financing, fossil fuels, green energy, oil, renewable energy, social change, T. Boone Pickens
Whether its “conventional” sources or renewable, energy is energy, and there is money to be made.
What does Exxon investment mean for algae biofuels?
By Callum James
The US Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) have recently announced that ExxonMobil are set to invest as much as $600 million in biofuel production technology, specifically biofuel produced from algae. Exxon seem to be following the lead of many other much smaller energy companies who have been researching algae as a source of biofuel for some time.
However Exxon are not doing this on their own, they will work alongside Synthetic Genomics Inc. (SGI). Together they have formed a research and development partnership focused on exploring the production of biofuels from photosynthetic algae. EERE plan on using photosynthetic algae, such as single-celled “microalgae” and blue-green algae, harnessing their ability to use sunlight to convert carbon dioxide into cellular oils along with some long-chain hydrocarbons that can be processed into fuels and chemicals.
The are two main advantages of algae-based biofuel.
- Algae-based biofuel could be converted into a renewable replacement for gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet fuel, without requiring major vehicle retrofitting. The flexibility to refine multiple fuels from a single source is also attractive.
- Yield from algae production dwarfs that of even the most robust crop-based biofuels on a per-acre basis – more than three times as great as current crops can produce.
I applaud this move. The current actors in the energy markets are extremely well-positioned for this new development. The trading, distribution, and regulatory systems are already in place, no “perfect storm” of events has to fall into place (as was true of the Pickens Plan). No disruption of consumers’ patterns of consumption or lifestyles is required to transition to these new fuels.
Better living through chemistry – the 21st century version.
Filed under: new media | Tags: internet, new media, social change
Leave a comment
More revelations this week about belt-tightening at the New York Times – holding salaries steady (at the same levels since 2006, btw), selling off 750,000 sq. ft. of its headquarters (which it will then rent back for $25 million per year!), and dumping its corporate jet.
I can’t find the link to the story where I read that last item, but a glance through teh Google gives one a pretty good indication about the glee in the blogosphere – left and right – about this change in fortune for the Old Gray Lady. Commenters from both ends of the political spectrum that have bemoaned its perceived shortcomings will no doubt see this as the inevitable result of the increasing irrelevance and/or well-deserved comeuppance for the (pick your favorite epithet here) traditional/drive-by/liberal/mainstream/dead tree/conservative/ media.
But there are consequences to this paradigm shift. Clay Shirky writes:
Print media does much of society’s heavy journalistic lifting, from flooding the zone — covering every angle of a huge story — to the daily grind of attending the City Council meeting, just in case. This coverage creates benefits even for people who aren’t newspaper readers, because the work of print journalists is used by everyone from politicians to talk radio hosts to bloggers. The newspaper people often note that newspapers benefit society as a whole. This is true, but irrelevant to the problem at hand; “You’re gonna miss us when we’re gone!” has never been much of a business model. So who covers all that news if some significant fraction of the currently employed newspaper people lose their jobs?
I don’t know. Nobody knows. We’re collectively living through 1500, when it’s easier to see what’s broken than what will replace it. The internet turns 40 this fall. Access by the general public is less than half that age. Web use, as a normal part of life for a majority of the developed world, is less than half that age. We just got here. Even the revolutionaries can’t predict what will happen.
Provocative stuff, and worth the read.